Rajender Kumar v. Shravan Badruka And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
\\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 1 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 ol tl\e Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 26.10.2015 in R.A.No.174 of 2014 on the fite of the court of the Addl. chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
Ra,jender Kumar, S/o. Late Babulal, aged 4l years, Occ: Business in premises No. 1 5-9-481, Mehboobgunj, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONERYRESPONDENT AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. lr,4ukundlal Badruka, aged 42 years, Occ: Business
2. Shyam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, aged 4j years, Occ: Business, Both Rl/o. H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & 10, Road NO. 12,Banjara Hiils, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT CRPMP. NO: 1 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order passed in RA No. 174 ol 2014 dated: 26-10-2015 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DAMODAR MUNDRA Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. A. ACHUTHANAND The Court made the following: ORDER
( THE HON']tLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIV L REVISION PETITION NO.1 OF 2016 ORDER:
Learned c runsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settle I between the parties and, therefore, the Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as inf: uctuous.
There shr ll be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if a-ry, pending shall stand dismissed. \ SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANTREGISTRAR ./'
,TRUE COPY'
t\ ,-- \,,/ SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Additional Cl ief Judge, City Small Causes Court' Hyderabad'
2. One CC to Sri Da nodar Mundra, Advocate IOPUC]
3. One CC to Sri R. \. Achuthanand, Advocate IOPUCI
4. Two CD CoPies
5. One SPare CoPY gbr &
HIGH COURT DATED: 311121i021 II t I7 til 2il22 -J t)
ORDER
CRP.No.1 of 2( 16 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTU OUS ) I