← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/6975/2015compromise

Syed Azmathullah v. The State Of Telangana, Rep., Pp

2015-07-29B.Siva Sankara Rao3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Crl.P.M.P.No.6900 of 2015 AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.6975 of 2015 Between :

Syed Azmathullah S/o.Syed Walliullah And five others ... Petitioners/A.1 to A.5 & A.7 AND The State of Telangana Rep. by Public Prosecutor and another.

... Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 29.07.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO 1.

W h e t h e r Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

Yes/No

3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

Yes/No HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.6900 of 2015 AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.6975 of 2015 COMMON ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners/A.1 to A.5 & A.7 under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.166 of 2015 on the file of the XXIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 342 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Pending the criminal petition, Crl.M.P.No.6900 of 2015 is filed by the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant along with joint memo, seeking permission to compound the criminal case stating that she herself and the 1st petitioner/A.1 are agreed to live together by drowning their case and also for the welfare of their child's future.

3. Having heard the parties, permission is thereby accorded as the parties stated that they have amicably settled the matter to purchase peace. Accordingly, the offences are compounded in terms of their compromise at

the instance of the de facto complainant since present with the petitioners.

4. Accordingly, Crl.P.M.P.No.6900 of 2015 is allowed. Consequently, the criminal petition is allowed and all the proceedings relating to C.C.No.166 of 2015 on the file of the XXIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, are quashed against the petitioner. The bail bonds of the petitioners/ A.1 to A.5 & A.7, if any, shall stand cancelled.

5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 29th July 2015.

mar