Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd v. A.V.L. Narasima Rao (Died)

I I I [ 3302 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD I FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE :

I PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH CITY CIVlL COURT APPEAL NO: 203 OF 2OO4 I Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C against the judgment and Decree Dated 1510312004 made in O.S- No. 346 of 2OO1 on the file of the Court of the Xl Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (F.T.C) '

Between:

1- Express Publications (lt/adurai) Ltd, Anna Salai, Madras Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director.

2. Chairman & Managing Director, Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd., Anna Salai Madras.

3. Vice President (PAP), Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd Anna Salai Madras.

4. Express Publicalions (Madurai) Ltd.,, Lower Tank Bund Road Domalguda, Hyderabad.

..APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS AND

1. A.V.L. Narasima Rao (died P.R LRs)

2. Sita Mahalakshmi, Wo. late AVL Narasimha rao Aged 48 years, Occ:Housewife.

3. A.D.R. Giridhar, S/o. late AVL Narasimha rao Aged 24 years, Occ: nil_

4. A.Sashidhar, S/o. late AVL Narasimha rao Aged 22 yea$, Occ: nil.\ (All are Rl/o. H.No. 159 Medipally Village Ghatkesar (M) R.R. Dist.) ...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF l.A. NO: I OF 2OO4(CCCAMP. NO: 11604 OF 2004) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings of the judgment and decree passed dated 15-03-2004 in OS No. 346 of 200'l on the file of Xl Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. S. RAVINDRANATH Advocate (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. P. V. RAVINDRA KUMAR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH cCCA No.2O3 of2OO4 JUDGMENT:

0\1,. On 1 1.O9.2O23 when the matter was called, there was no representation and, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal"' Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that appellants are not interested to prosecute this aPPeal.

2.

Accordingly, the CCCA is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs. 3, Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.

Sd/- K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT €dffRAR ",J;,"%;* I //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Xl Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad

2. One CC to SRl. S. RAVINDRANATH Advocare [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. P. V. RAVINDRA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies HA/KBSK t\s

HIGH COURT DATED:06/10/2023 1t\e sTAle.

(

JUDGMENT

Q f,co I [2 n z C) L .r:-)t ./,'

CCCA.No.2O3 of 2004 'l * Appeal is dismissed for Non-Prosecution /default l