S. Rammohan v. S. Krishna Mohan

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1996 OF 2021 Petition under Section 1 15 of Civil Procedure Code, aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 15.09.2021 passed in l.A. No.1192of 2019 in O.S. No.1259 of ' 2014 on the file of the Vlll Addl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

Between:

S. Rammohan, S/o Late S. Janardhana Chary, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No.13-10-45147, SVSRS, Plot No.501, Shriram Enclave, New Gaddiannaram, Disukhnagar, Hyderabad - 500 060. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO. 2/PLAINTIFF NO. 2 AND

1. S. Krishna Mohan, S/o Late Janardhana Chary Aged about 51 years, Occ. Employee, R/o H.No.3-74, Prashanthi Hills, Meerpet, R.R. District - 500 079.

....RESPONDENT'PETITTONER'PLAINTIFF NO. 1

2. Smt. D. Jyothi, Wo Dr. D. Ramesh, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.3 -7432tNF 504, tshwarya Manar Apartments, Mansurabad, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 068.

....RESPONDENT'RESPONDENT NO. I/DEF NO. 1

3. Smt.S.Kousalya Devi (Died), Wo late S.JanardhanChry. Defendant No. 1 (Died) lA NO: I OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order and decree dated 15'9-2021 passed in l.A.No.1 19212019 in O.S.No. 1259t2O14 on the file of the Vlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy, in so far as the petitioner is concerned. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. E RAMESH CHANDRA GOUD Counset for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. K R K GARGEYA The Court made the following: ORDER

THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C.R.P. No.1996 of 2O2l ORDER:

Today when the matter has come up before this Court for hearing, it has brought to the notice of this Court that as per the proceedings in the ' E-Courts in respect of the pending suit i.e., O.S.No. 1259 of 2014, it is found that the suit itself is decreed in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties before the trial court and nothing survives in this revision petition. 2.

Having regard to the same, this revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. l'here shall be no order as to costs. ,t"":],:1:::. o.1""", oal are pending, shall stand closed. SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REG]STRAR /,TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Vlll r\ddl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. One CC to Sri. E Ramesh Chandra Goud Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC tc Sri. K R K Gargeya, Advocate tOpUCI

4. Two CD Oopies.

u, PM/SA

/ HIGH COURT DATED:1711012025 ) ,F* toR THE S T4 t''

I

ORDER

L;

() CRP.No.fl 996 ot 2021 'l [ 111p mr * DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS L x1b