Cm Engineering College, v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15756 of 2012 10.06.2015 Between:

CM Engineering College and another

...Petitioners

And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others

...Respondents

Counsel for the petitioners: Mr.Sricharan Telaprolu Counsel for respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Higher Education (TG) Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr.K.Rathanga Pani Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2: Mr.C.Sudesh Anand, standing counsel for A.P.S.C.H.E.

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: "....to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 herein in not approving the admission of the four students admitted by the 1st petitioner college, who passed the qualifying examination in the month of December, 2011 through National Institute of Open Schooling, who were admitted under Category-B seats, into 1st year B.Tech Course for the academic year 2011-12 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and in violation of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to approve the admissions of the four students admitted by the 1st petitioner college under Category-B seats into 1st year B.Tech Course for the academic year 2011-

12 to pursue their respective courses and pass such other order or orders...."

Mr.Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that as per his instructions, the four students admitted by petitioner No.1 college with respect to whom the present writ petition is filed are not continuing their education in petitioner No.1 college and that therefore, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.

In the light of the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 23.05.2012 in W.P.M.P.No.20327 of 2012 is vacated and W.P.M.P.Nos.20327 and 45625 of 2012 and W.V.M.P.No.3018 of 2012 shall stand dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th June, 2015 GHN