← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/19831/2011dismissed

Arramraj Surender Raj v. The Government Of A.P.

2017-02-27S.V.Bhatt3 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.19831 of 2011 ORDER:

The petitioner alleges inaction of the 2nd respondent in conduc ting enquiry vide charge Memo Proceedings No.A6/ 1940/ 2010Pts, dated 25-09-2010, as illegal and unconstitutional. The issue arises under Section 249(6) of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that with passage of time, the cause in the writ petition is rendered ineffective. The statement is placed on record.

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. Misc ellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand c losed. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J Dt: 27-02-2017 Prv

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.19831 of 2011 27-02-2017 Prv