Ganga Boina Yuv Raj v. Sri Chandra Sheker

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1s929tA4 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1 0 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated. 15.11.2021 passed in Writ Petition No.23690 o'f 2021 . Between:

GangaBoina Yuv Raj, S/o. Late Ganga Boina Janardhan, Age 71 years. Occ.Retired, R/o.1 -6-2121 107 165l I 49,Gangaputra Colony, Ramnagar, Musheerabad.

...Petitioner

AND

1. Sri Chandra Sheker, The Divisional Engineer (Electrical) Operation, Distribution-Vl, Cityfl-SSPDCL, Azamabad, Hyderabad-20

2. Sri Papaaiah, The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Electrical) Operation, Distribution-Vl, City ll, SE/OP/GHYD CENTRAL AE Ramnagar 69 TSSPDCL Azamabad, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. VINOD REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

(.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Co mDt Case o.1592 of 202t ORDER:

The present Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience to the order passed by this court in w.P.N0,23690 of 2021, dt.15.11.2021. 2.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submit that pursuant to the order of this court dt.15.11.2021, the petitioner had made an application and the same was considered and disposed of by the respondents-on 03,t2.2021, whereby the request of the petitioner for releasing the power supply to the residential house bearing No.1-6-2t21107/65/49 situated at Gangaputra Colony, Ramnagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, stands rejected' 3.

since this court had directed respondents 2 and 3 to receive the application and process the same strictly as per law and the respondents having received the application and passed the order thereon, on 03.12.2021, there is sufficient compliance of the order of this Court. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said rejection order, it is open for him to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law, but that, by itself, would not confer any right on the petitioner to initiate contempt proceedings.

4.

Granting liberty, as noted above, the Contempt Case is closed' 5.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendlng shall stand closed. / VENKATESHWARULU DEPUTY-BEGISTRAR (u,., SECTION OFFICER \ Sd/.CH.

//TRUE COPY// To,

1. Sri Chandra Sheker, The Divisional Engineer (Electrical) OPeration' Distribution-Vl, City-IITSSPDCL, Azamabad, Hyderabad-20

2. Sri PaPaaiah, The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Electrical) Operat gar 69 ton, Dlstribution-Vl, CitY I SE/OP/GHYD CENTRAL AE Ramna e"nIJ.'"'

TSSPDCLAzamabad, Hyderabad.

3. One CC to Sri Thakur Roopa Singh, Advocate [OPUC] ;. O;" CC to Sri R' Vinod Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies

6. One Spare CoPY MMK z_I

HIGH COURT DATED:0810412022 II I l ) 'rA ,r 1i: ', .,!, ':"'1 r) {) .)

ORDER

CC.No.1592 ot 2021 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

N,', / \ob o9\