Mohd Ilyas Ahmed v. The State Of Telangana And 5 Others

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR WRI T PETI TI ON No.28977 of 2019 O R D E R:

This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 and 6 in sending the constables to the petitioner's property/plot and threatening to vacate and surrender the possession of the petitioner's plot No.A 384 in Survey No.165 Part situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and causing interference in the civil matters/disputes without any authority or jurisdiction, as being illegal and arbitrary. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3.

In similar matter, being W.P.No.28913 of 2019, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home obtained written instructions, and based on such instructions, he denied the allegation of the petitioner that respondents 5 and 6 sent constables to petitioner's land and threatened him to vacate and surrender possession of the land. It is submitted that respondents 5 and 6 are only discharging their legitimate duties and did not harass, threaten or interfere in the civil disputes in any manner, nor did they interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station, at any point of time. Recording the said submissions, by order, dated 30.12.2019, this Court closed the said writ petition. 4.

Having regard to the above, since the petitioner herein is similarly situated, and in view of the fact that the land in respect of which the relief is being sought is also part of the layout in Gopanpally Village, the order, dated 30.12.2019, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28913 of 2019, will

apply to this case, and therefore, no further orders need be passed in the present writ petition also.

5.

The writ petition is accordingly closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR Date:31.12.2019 GJ