Damela Chennudu v. The State Of Telangana,
[ 3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8631 OF 2019 Between:
Damela Chennudu, S/o Naganna aged Major, Occ- Govt Employee R/o. H.No.
1-2-3431261N1, Phool Bagh, Domalguda, Hyderabad ... Petitioner/Accused AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad
2. P.Narsimulu Yadav, S/o Late P.Naga Yadav Aged about 45 years, OccSocial Welfare Ryo H.No. 1 - 1 -'1 002/45, Ramnagar. Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the orders Dated 05.09.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.982 of 2019 in Crl-Appeal No.1002 of 2017 on the file of lV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, City Criminal Courts, at Nampally, Hyderabad and Quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and allow the Crl.M.P.No.982 of 2019.
l.A. NO: { OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in Crl.Appeal No.1 002 of 2017 on the file of lV Addlitional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, City Criminal Courts, at Nampally, Hyderabad, pending the disposal of the above Criminal Petition, pending disposal of Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S P PANDU RANGA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri P ACHUT RAMA SHASTRY. Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER {
THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.8631 OF 2019 ORDER:
1 .
l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that the have compromised the matter before the Lok parties as such, the cause in this Criminal Petition does Adalat, not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous 2.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal i Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand i i closed I i SD/.P. PADMANABHA RE DY ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I
1. The lV Addilional Metropotitan Sessions Judge, City Criminal Courts, at Nampally, Hyderabad
2. Two CCs to the Pubtic prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. One CC to SRt P PANDU RANGA REDDY, Advocate [OpUC]
4. One CC to SRt p ACHUT RAtvlA SHASTRY, Advocate [OpUC]
5. Two CD Copies ADK MY L\\L
HIGH COURT DATED:271'1212023
ORDER
o lHE sIA CRLP.No.8631 of 2019 o L) 0 5 ilAB 202d .)- * parcHEl DISMISSING THE CRLP @*+s