Chi. K. Sai Tejeswani v. The Convenor, Eamcet - 2008,

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT APPEAL No.849 OF 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Both Sri T.Jagdish, learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri V.Ramchander Goud, learned Standing Counsel for JNTU, agree that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive and that the writ appeal has become infructuous.

The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) _____________________________ (U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J) 05th August 2016 JSU THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO

WRIT APPEAL No.849 OF 2008 Date: 05.08.2016 JSU