← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/9385/2011dismissed no costs

Bollineni Satyanarayana Naidu v. Sub Insecptor Of Police,

2017-01-17S.V.Bhatt1 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.9 3 8 5 of 2 0 1 1 ORDER:

Mr. Mallesham, representing learned counsel for petitioner on record, having regard to the changed circumstances, on instructions, does not press the writ prayer.

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J January 17, 2017 DSK