← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/29127/2019dismissed no costs

Uradi Laxmi v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Othersa

2020-01-02P Naveen Rao3 pages

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.29127 OF 2019 DATED : 02.01.2020 Between :

Uradi Laxmi W/o.Parsharam, Aged about 34 yrs, Occu : Housewife, R/o.Chintakunta Village, Kothapally Mandal, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

..... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.

.....Respondents The Court made the following:

- 2 - THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29127 OF 2019 ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. 2.

Petitioner claims that his mother executed a Gift Settlement Deed, on land to an extent of Ac.1-00 in Sy.No.84/A of Chintakunta Village, Kothapally Mandal, Karimnagar District, by way of registered document dated 10.01.2001. Earlier there was an attempt made by her brother to occupy the said extent of land, compelling the petitioner to file O.S.No.225 of 2005 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, praying to grant perpetual injunction. A decree was passed in her favour on 19.01.2015 by the trial Court. After the decree was passed in her favour, she submitted an application on 17.08.2019 to the Tahsildar-3rd respondent to mutate her name in the revenue records. Alleging inaction, on the said application, this writ petition is filed.

3.

The copy of the application made for mutation, is enclosed as Ex.P.1. However, though the said application was made in form VI-A, there is no material on record, to show that such application was made as per the procedure required, i.e., application through online web portal. There is no proof of even acknowledgement of making such application. Thus, the prayer sought in the writ petition cannot be granted.

4.

Thus, leaving it open to the petitioner to make application as required by the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the Rules made thereunder,

- 3 - the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it is needless to observe that if any application is made, as required, the same shall be considered within six weeks from the date of receipt of such application. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 2nd January, 2020 Rds