← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/13980/2009dismissed

A.Madusudhan Reddy, Karimnagar District v. The Depot Manager, Apsrtc Huzurabad Depot, Karimnagar

2018-11-09Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.13980 OF 2009

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: ".... to issue a writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in I.D.No.9 of 2006, dated 13.3.2007 on the file of Hon'ble Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the respondent herein to grant two annual increments with all attendant benefits including continuity of service and arrears and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice as otherwise the petitioner may suffer irreparable loss and hardship." Heard Sri P.Govinda Rajulu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Smt Danda Radhika, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation.

It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as Conductor in the year 1978 and while he was discharging his duties on 12.10.1984, the checking officials of the respondentCorporation conducted check and alleged that he indulged in cash and ticket irregularities. The respondent-Corporation construing the said act as misconduct, initiated disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and after conducting enquiry, imposed punishment deferment of annual increment for a period of two years with cumulative effect vide order dated 19.12.1984. Challenging the same, he filed I.D.No.

Godavarikhani. The Labour Court vide Award dated 13.03.2007 dismissed the same. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that without conducting any enquiry, the disciplinary authority had imposed the major punishment and without appreciating any of the contentions raised by the petitioner, the Labour Court dismissed the I.D.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation contends that the disciplinary authority had rightly imposed the punishment against the petitioner and the Labour Court had rightly dismissed the ID preferred by the petitioner and hence, no interference is called for by this Court.

Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered view that except the present charges, no other allegations were levelled against the petitioner in his entire career, the Labour Court ought to have interfered with the punishment atleast on the proportionality theory and granted relief to him. Therefore, this Court feels that ends of justice would be met if the punishment of deferment of annual increment for a period

of two years with cumulative effect is modified to that of without cumulative effect and without monetary benefits. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The order dated 19.12.1984 passed by the respondent-Corporation is modified to that of deferment of annual increment for a period of two years without cumulative effect and without monetary benefits. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 9th November, 2018 rkk