G. Srinivas Reddy, v. The Special Deputy Collector,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3302 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 29205 OF 2010 Between:
G.Srinivas Reddy, S/o- Late Pedda Sai Reddy, aged about 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagrala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy, lvla ha b ub na ga r Di strict.
...PETITIONER AND
1. The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Bheema Phase ll, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy, [,4ahabubnagar.
2. G. Masi Reddy, S/o. late G. Pedda Sai Reddy, Agriculture, FVo. Nagrala Village, Pebba Mahabubnagar.
aged about 70 years, Occ:
r Mandal, Wanaparthy, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased lo call for the records connected with the proceedings of the 1st respondent in disbursing the compensation amounts in favour of 2nd respondent herein without considering the objections filed by the petilioner dated 0'l-04-2010 and 20-10-2010 against joint houses i.e., R.S.B.R. award No.433 (G.P. House NO. 3-94) 434 (G.P, House No. 3-95) and 435 ( G.P. House No. 3-96) of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent Nagarla Village, Pebbair Mandal, lVlahabubnagar District as illegal and void by issuing an appropriate Writ Order or Directing preferably one in the nature Writ of Mandamus.
NO: 1 OF 2010 MP. NO: 37197 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in disbursing the amounts against joint houses i-e., R.S.B.R. award No. 433 (G.P. House No. 3-94\ 434 (G.P. House No. 3-95) ani 435 (G.P. House No. 3-96) of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent Nagarla Village, Pebbair Mandal, Mahabubnagar District pending the final disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J.SURESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: - The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.292O5 of 201O ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no further orders are necessary in this matter and the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.
Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
3.
As scquel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall sta rrd cl<;sed.
SD/- B.SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR IL SECTION,/OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to SRI J.SURESH BABU, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies q BSR GJ
HIGH COURT DATED: 2911212023 Eg STAT bYr$\ t;
j, t5 .+ +.
itB
ORDER
WP.No.29205 ot 2010 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS @a1tu C^Cl- ,)b