Ganji Mohan Rao, Bangalore And 3 Otrs., v. State Of Telangana, Rep Pp And ANR.,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1 678 0F 2015 Between:

'1 . Ganji Mohan Rao S/o Shankariah

2. Ganji Nirmala Devi Wo Sankaraiah

3. Ganji Sankaraiah S/o.G.K.Rao

4. D.Kavitha W/o Srinivas ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No. 1 to 4 AND

1. The State Of Telangana, represented by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT No.1

2. Smt. Ganji Mamatha Wo [\/ohan Rao, R/o H.No Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

1 4-991D, lVloosarambagh, ...RESPONDENT No.2/COMpLAtNANT Petition under Section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to QUASH the FtR in Crime No.30 of 2O15of WpS, CCS, Hyderbad against the petitionerslAl to 4 in the interest of justice. CRLPMP. NO: 1815 OF 2015 Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners/A1 to 44 in crime No.30 of 2015 on the file of wpS, ccs, Hyderabad pending disposal of the main Crl.p

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M JANARDHAN RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Kasuri Satyanarayana, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITI ONNo.t678 of 2O15 ORDER:

1. The present Criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.3O of 20 1 5 of Women police Station, CCS, Hyderabad.

2.

No representation on petitioners, side on call. On 30.11.2022 also, there was no representation. 3.

On 30. Il.2022,Iearned Additional public prosecuror submitted that the Criminal petition has become infructuous. As there is no representation on petitioners, side continuously, taking into consideration the submission made by learned Additional public prosecutor, this Criminal Petition is dismissed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// qD SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad

2. The SHO, WPS, DD, PS, HYderabad

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad' IOUI

4. One CC to SRl. M JANARDHAN RAO Advocate IOPUC]

5. One CC to SRl. KUSURI SATYANARAYANA Advocate [OPUC] 9L A Trarn Cl-l Cnnioc

HIGH COURT Dr. CSL, J DATED: 0711212022 l l 6-\ l Jl,i{ 7[23 f) ;:l 70 -1..

ORDER

J CRLP.No.1678 of 2015 ..isl,,:r -{---_-:i::

Dismissing the Crl.P 0) cof#* @