Potti Narsamma v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.29139 OF 2019 DATED : 02.01.2020 Between :

Potti Narsamma W/o.Late Anjaiah, Aged about 48 yrs, Occu : Agriculture, R/o.Matugudem H/o.Manchanpally Village, Presently residing at Gurrampally Village, Choudary Gudem mandal, Ranga Reddy District ..... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.

.....Respondents The Court made the following:

- 2 - THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29139 OF 2019 ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. 2.

Petitioner claims that her family owns lands to an extent of, Ac.2-00 in Sy.No.364/u/1 of Rapolu Village, Parigi Mandal, Vikarabad District and Ac.2-15 guntas in Sy.No.255/AA (2-09 guntas) and 256/E1 (0-06 guntas) of Manchanpally Village. Both the Villages are adjacent and therefore, the lands of petitioner's family falls in two different villages of two different mandals. Petitioner applied for mutation of her name in the revenue records. The application submitted by the petitioner for mutation, in so far as property in Manchanpally Mandal, proceedings are issued on 28.01.2019, but the lands in Rapolu Village is concerned, no proceedings are issued so far.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the representation made by the petitioner to Tahsildar, Parigi (M) on 10.09.2018 and contends that though the representation is received, so far mutation proceedings are not issued. 4.

However, as per the procedure evolved by the Government, application for mutation has to be made in Form VI-A through online web portal. Merely because mutation proceedings are granted in the other village, cannot be a ground to hold that nonconsideration of the representation, which is not made in accordance with the procedure required, is illegal, warranting interference by this Court at this stage.

- 3 - 5.

Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to make an application in Form VI-A. However, it is needless to observe that notwithstanding the dismissal of writ petition, if any application is made by the petitioner as required, the same shall be considered and appropriate decision be made within six (6) weeks from the date of submission of such application. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 2nd January, 2020 Rds