← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/621/2022disposed of no costs

Bvs Prakasa Rao v. The State Of Telangana

2026-01-22K. Sujana9 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos :621.622 and 625 OF 2022 Crl. Revision Case Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by docket order passed in M.P.No. 25 ot 2O22 in M.P.No. 259 of 2018 in M.G.No. 13 of 2018 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad. Between:

BVS Prakasa Rao, S/o Late B. Rama Sastry, Aged 53 Years, Occ. Self- Employed, R/o. Plot No.893A, SKD Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District- 500070 .PETITIONER/ Respondent AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor

2. Chivukula Sarita, D/o. Chivukula Pandurangam. Aged 48 Years, Occ. Homeopathy Doctor. Medical Transcriptionist.

a. Nitya Pragati, D/o Chivukula Saritha, Aged 5 % years Minor, Rep. by her mother and natural guardian, Respondent Chivukula Sarita, D/o Chivukula Pandurangam, R/o. H. No. 12-13-7051 A, B, S.S Heights, Flat No.105, Gokul Nagar, Taranaka, Secunderabad-5000 1 7 ...RESPONDENTS/ Petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances pleased to suspend the docket order dated 01.O9.2022 passed by the Court below in M.P.No.2S of 2022 in M.P.No.259 ol 2O18 in MC No.13 of 2018. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 pleased to suspend the orders of prl family court dated 04-03-2025.in Crl.M.P. No. 446 ot 2024 in Crl.M.P.No. 25 of 2022 in Crl.M.P.No. 259 of 2018 in M.C.No. 13 of 2018, to the extent of the Prl. Family Court direction to the petitioner to pay

educational expenses to the 3'd respondent as per the order in Crl.M.P.no. 25 of 2022in Crl..P.No. 259 of 2018 in M.C.No. 13 of 2018 and execution of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 by the petitioner and extend suspension in Crl.R.C.No. 621 of 2022.

IA :1OF pleased to permit the petitioner to appear as party -in-person (petitioner herein) in Crl. RC .No. 621 of 2022 and pass such other order br orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice pleased lA PRAYER pleased to a) Direct the 2nd Respondent to producer her bank statement showing actual payment of school fees made by for Respondent No.3 inCrlMPNo25of 2022in Crl.M.P.No.259of2018 M.C.No. 13of 2018 ,in the alternative draw an adverse interference against 2nd Respondent for her non production of such records; and Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KARRA V.V.S.N. MURTHY ( NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SMT. VALLURU PADMA CASE Crl. Revision Case Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the docket order passed in M.P.No. 198 of 2020 in M.P.No. 259 of 20{8 in M.C.No. 1 3 of 2018 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad. Between:

BVS Prakasa Rao, S/o Late B. Rama Sastrv, Aged 53 Years, Occ Self- Employed, R/o Plot No.893A, SKD Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District- 500070 ..PETITIONER/ Respondent

1. The State of Telangana , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor

2. Chivukula Sarita, D/o Chivukula Pandurangam, Aged 48 Years, Occ Homeopathy Doctor. Medical Transcriptionist.

3. Nitya Prdgati, D/o Chivukula Saritha, AgedS%. years Minor, Rep mother and natural guardian, Respondent Chivukula Santa, D/o C . by her hivukula ;

Pandurangam, R/o H. No 12-13-705/A, B, S.S Heights, Flat No 105 Gokul Nagar,Tarbnaka, Secunderabad-5000 1 7 ...RESPONDENTS/ Petitioners lA NO: 3 OF 2025 pleased to direct the responded to produce her bank statement showing actual payments of school fees made for respondent No 3 in Grl.MP.259 of 2018 in M.C No 13/ 2018 in alternative draw an adverse inference against 2 respondent for her non production of such record .

lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances pleased to suspend Prl. Family Court order dated 04-03-2025 in Crl.Mp 445 of 2024 in Crl.Mp.198 of 2020 in Cr..M.P. 25912018 in M.C. 1312018 to extent of directions the passed by the Court below in M P No 198 of 2020|N M P No 259 of 2018 in MC No 13 of 2018 lA NO: 1 OF 2023 stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the'High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to appear as party -in-person (petitioner herein) in Crl .RC .No. 622 of 2022 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2022 pleased to suspend the docket order dated 01.09.2022 passed by the Court below in M.P.No.198 of 2020 lN M.P.No.259 of 2018 in MC No.13 of 2018 and pass Counset for the Petitioner: SRl. KARRA V.V.S.N. IIIURTHY ( NOT PRESENT) Counset for the Respondent No.1 : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SMT. VALLURU PADMA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 625 OF 2022 Crl. Revision Case Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the docket order passed in M.P.No. 183 of 2021 in M.P.No. 259 of 2018 in M.C.No. 13 of 201 8 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad. at BVS Prakasa Rao, S/o Late B. Rama Sastry, Aged 53 Ydars, Occ. Self- Employed, R/o. Plot No.B93A, SKD Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District- 500070 . PETITIONER/ Respondent

1. The State of Telangana , Rep., by it Public Prosecutor High Court For the State of Telangana. Hyderabad.

2. Chivukula Sarita, D/o. Chivukula Pandurangam, Aged 48 Years, Occ. Homeopathy Doctor. Medical Transcriptionist

3. Nitya Pragati, D/o Chivukula Saritha, Aged 5 %. years Minor, Rep. by her mother and natural guardian, Respondent Chivukula Santa, D/o Chivukula Pandurangam, R/o. H. No. 12-13-7051 A, B, S.S Heights, Flat No.105, Gokul Nagar, Taranaka, Secunderabad-500017 ...RESPONDENTS/ Petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances pleased to suspend Prl. Family Court order dated 04-03-2025 in Crl.Mp 442 of 2024 in Crl.Mp.183 ot 2021 in Cr..M.P. 25912018 in M.C. 1312018 to extent of directions the passed by the Court below in M P No 183 of 2020 lN M P No 259 of 2018 in MC No 13 of 2018 to the 3d respondent and to execute a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and extend suspension in Crl.R.C.No. 625 ot 2022.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023 pleased to permit the petitioner to appear as party in person (petitioner herein) in Crl RC No.625 ot 2022 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.

suspend the docket order dated 01.09.2022 passed by the Court below in M.P.No.183 of 2021 in M.P.No.259 of 2018 in MC No.13 of 2018 and pass lA NO: 3 OF 2025 pleased to direct the 2 respondent to producer bank statement showing actual payment of school fees made by 3 respondent in crlmp.no.183 of 2021 in crlp.mp.259 of 2018 om mc'13 of 2018,in the alternative draw an adverse interference against 2 respondent for her non production of such record Counselfor the Petitioner: SRl. KARRA V.V.S.N. MURTHY ( NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SMT. VALLURU PADMA The Court made the following Common Order:

./,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA I'ITTIUTN REI/ISION CASE N 62L- 622 AND 625 oF 20.22 DATE t22.OL.2O26 Between :

BVS Prakasa Rao Petitioner/ Respondent And The State of Telangana, R.p., by its Public Prosecutor & two others Respondents : COMMON ORDER:

Crl.R.C.No.62l of 2022 is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the docket order dated OL.OT.2O22 passed in M.P-No.2S of 2022 in M.P.No.259 of 2Ol8 in M.C.No.13 of 2018, Crl.R.C.No.622 of 2022 is hled by the petitioner aggrieved by the docket order dated O1.O9.2022 passed in M.P.No.198 of 2O2O in M.P.No.259 of 2018 in M.C.No.13 of 2018 and Cr1.R.C.No.625 of 2022 is lrled aggrieved by the docket order dated O1.O9.2O22 in M.P.No.183 of 2021 in M.P.No.259 of 2018 in M.C.No.13 of 2018 by the Principal Family Judge at Secunderabad. The

-2petitioner in all these revisions is one and the same and appeared before this Court as party-in-person 2.

Heard Smt.Valluru Padma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. No representation on behalf of petitioner/ party- in - person.

3.

The trial Court while recalling the warrants pending against the petitioner herein directed to pay certain amounts and challenging the same, the petitioner herein filed these revision cases and this Court suspended execution of the impugned orders. Further in view of the stay granted by this Court, the trial Court is not proceeding with the case. Petitioner having obtained stay orders is not appearing before this Court. Qn 12-12.2025 also, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner, as such, this Court has vacated the suspension order vide I.A.No.2 of 2025 in all the revision cases. 4.

[n view of the submissions made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, having obtained stay orders from this Court, the petitioner is not showing interest in pursuing the matters, the petitioner is directed to pursue his case in the trial Court.

-3i 5.

With the above observation, all the three Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions, if &ry, pending shall stand closed.

SD/.AVSPRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ON OFFICER To,

1. The Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad.

2. Sri BVS Prakasa Rao, S/o Late B. Rama Sastry, , Occ. Self- Employed, R/o. Plot No.893A, SKD Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District- 500070

3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State'of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

4. One CC to Sri V.V.S.N. Murthy, Advocate (OPUC)

5. one CC to SMT. VALLURU PADMA, Advocate (OPUC)

6. Two CD Copies kul/ABKw

HIGH COURT DATED:2210112026 t,:'''

s J[N T\1t .J ?1 t COMMON ORDER CRLRC.NoS. 621.622 and 625 OF 2022 DTSPOSING OF I-HE ALL CRL. REVISION CASES.

.e€D o\ X@