V. Mary Yesupadam v. Mr.Sandeep Kumar Sultania, Ias
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO coNTEMPT CASE NO: 2514 OF 2025 Petition under Sections 1O to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, commit the Respondent for contempt of this Hon'ble Court in deliberately and willfully violating its order dated 25-03-2025 in W.P. No. 8693 of 2025. Between:
V. lVary Yesupadam, w/o. Chandra Shekhar Rao, age 62 years, Retired Dy, Secretary/ Regional Co-ordinator, Karimnagar Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational lnstitutions Society, Karimnagar. ...PETITIONER AND Mr.Sandeep Kumar Sultania, lAS, Now Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K RAMA SUBBA RAO Gounsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER
ry THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJI:;HWAR RAO CONTEM PT CASE No -2sL4 0F 2021 ,
ORDER
Heard Sri K. Rama Subba Rao, tearned counsel or the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-iII, ' rpearing for the respondent 2.ThisContemptCaseisfiledallegingviolationoftlorderpassedby this Court in W.P.No.B693 ot 2025, dated 25.03'2025' 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ll . respondent has complied with the order dated 25.03-2025 passed 0y this Court in W.P.No.8693 of 2025.
4.
In view of the submission made by the learn: I counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case ts closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pendi' ,1, if any, in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed.
ST /. L.LAKSHMI BABU : i:PUry REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. K Rama Subba Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCsto GP for Services lll, High Courtforthe Stat: ;f Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies.
:
l PM I I .l
t HIGH COURT RRN,J DATED:2811112025 ( ,, -1,1ic..;, , '1 C) .J )- l{u{l $) I i- := I
ORDER
CC.No.2514 of 2025 I CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE @