Bathulla Padma v. The State Of Telangana
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26155 of 2018 ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not permitting the petitioner for verification of certificates and not permitting her for applying in web counselling scheduled from 18.06.2018 to 20.06.2018 pursuant to TS DEECET-2018, as arbitrary and illegal.
2.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Education appearing for the respondents.
3.
The case of the petitioner is that she passed Bridge Course in the year 2018. The 2nd respondent has issued notification on 12.04.2018 for admission into D.EI.Ed (Diploma in Elementary Education), from the persons, who passed or appeared for the Intermediate Examination (Qualifying Exam) or its equivalent, as decided by the TS DEECET. Earlier, on the representation made by some persons, the Commissioner and Director of School Education, the 3rd respondent herein, recommended to the Government for taking a decision for giving admission to the persons, who are undergoing Bridge Course equivalent to Intermediate Education. As on today, no decision is taken. This Court in W.P.No.26078 of 2017 has already given a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the said aspect.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed the Bridge Course, which is equivalent to Intermediate qualifying examination. As such the petitioner is eligible for D.E.I.Ed
Course on par with the students, who passed the Intermediate examination.
5.
Learned Government Pleader submits that pursuant to the order, dated 29.08.2017, passed in W.P.No.26078 of 2017, the Government has considered and rejected the case; that even as per the G.O.Ms.No.10, School Education (Prog.II) Department, dated 12.04.2017, the candidates who passed Intermediate Examination with Vocational courses are not eligible for appearing the Common Entrance Test (DEECET). It is further stated that counselling is already over.
6.
Since the Government has already taken a decision, no relief can be granted in this writ petition. It is stated that the said rejection order is also being challenged by filing W.P.No.3447 of 2018. If the petitioner is also aggrieved by rejection order, she can also challenge the same.
7.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J JULY 31, 2018 YVL
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26155 of 2018 Date:31.07.2018 YVL