← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/28039/2015disposed of no costs

Shaik Khaleel Ahamad, S/O Late Shaik Ibrahim, v. The State Of A.P., Rep. By Its Prl. Secretary,

2015-09-15Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 28039 of 2015 BETWEEN Shaik Khaleel Ahamad ... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 15.09.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:-

Heard.

2. Petitioner's land, which is subject matter of this writ petition, also falls in survey No.68/2A1V of Joharapuram Village, Kurnool City, Kurnool District. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is similar to the one considered by this court in W.P.No.33167 of 2011 dated 16.12.2011.

3. Following the same, this writ petition is also disposed of. Operative portion whereof is as follows:

"The issue is no longer res integra in view of the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court reported in G. Narasaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 2011 Andhra Pradesh 101), wherein this Court considered similar facts and situations and gave directions to the respondents to receive and examine the documents in conformity with the Registration Act and Rules and pass appropriate orders for registration or otherwise, on the touchstone of law governing the field. In the present case, if there is no notification under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, the registering authority shall follow the law declared by this Court under the decision referred to above, receive the petitioner's document for registration and pass appropriate orders for registration or otherwise in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of." As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J September 15, 2015 LMV