C.Suresh, S/O. Sri C.Kishan, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 7052 OF 2015 Betwee n:

C.Suresh, S/o. Sri C.Kishan, Aged about 47 Yea$, Occ Business, R/o.H. No. 1 2-1'l -1 47 4, Boudha Naga r, Warasig uda, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. The Station House Officer, Chilukalaguda Police Station, Secunderabad, Hyderabad.

K.Nagesh, S/o.Narayana, Aged about 41 Years, Occ Business, C/o.Neon Technologies, H.No.1-5-1083/19B, Siri Nilayam, Flat No.302, Yellankis I\r'langapuram Colony, Phase-l I l, Old Aiwal, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, direction or order more especially on in the nature of Writ of Ivlandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in failing to execute the NBWs issued against the 4th Respondent in C.C.No.1389/2010 pending on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad since 13-122012 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Provisions of Cr.P.

C and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith Execute the NBWs pending against the 4th Respondent in C.C.No.1389/2010 pending on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper 1n the circumstances of the case.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 9382 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct

f the Respondents 2 & 3 to forthwith Execute the NBWs pending against the 4th Respondent in C.C.No.1389/20 10 pending on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. NAVEEN FOR SRl. C HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

.1/ HONOURABLE SR!JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY'

WRIT PETITION No.7052 OF 2015 ORDER:(ORAL) Mr. K. Naveen representing Mr. C. Hari Preeth, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in this writ petition does not survive necessitating any further adjudication, as such the writ petition may be disposed of as infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending in the writ petition stand closed.

sD/- K.

MAJI ASSISTANT REGI TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad' The Station House Officer, Chilukalaguda Police Station, Secunderabad' Hyderabad.

One CC to SRl. C HARI PREETH Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOIr/E ,High Court for the State of Telangana' [OUI Two CD Copies KKS GJP d{R

HIGH COURT DATED:1 211212024 1$g. Sitri i..

lt ,\(;\

ORDER

) 9.

0 ; ii,.;t ?[ZI WP.No.7O52 of 2015 lru€fl I !) DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS U( $lL t?5