Naushad v. Akram Ali Khan

\\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT fIYOERABAD

MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO:391 OF 2011 Between:

Naushad, S/o lsmail Bhai, Business, R/o Flat No. 3/C, Yuwan Apartments, Behind palace Heights Hotel, Abids, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT AND l.Akram AIi Khan, S/o Late Amjad AIi Khan,R/o H.No. 6-3-79'l , Ameerpet, Hyderabad 2.Ahsan Ali Khan (Died per LR Res. No.1), ...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS Appeal under Section 100 of CPC preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.02.2011 in AS No. 166/2008 on the file of X Additionat Chief Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgrnent and Decree dated 02.05.2008 in OS No. 4873 o12003 on the file of the Court of the V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. COUNSELFORTHEAPPELLANT : SRI HARENDERPRASAD COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONOENT : SRI P RAJENDER REDDY The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA sEco D APPEA L NO. 3910F 201t, JUDGMENT:

Plaintiffs filed O.S.No.4873 of 2003 on the file of V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The trial Court dismissed the I I suit. The unsuccessful plaintiffs preferred appeal videA.S.No'166 of :

2008 wherein the appellate Court had allowed the appeal, against which the second appeal has been filed.

2.

Learned counsel for appellant stated that the matter has been settled outside the Court. No purpose would be served in continuing the Second Appeat.

3.

Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD'. K. SHYLESHI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcTro OFFICER To 1.The X Additional chief Judge (FTC), City civil court, Hyderabad (with records if any) 2.Tne V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad' 5.One CC to SRI HARENDERPRASAD, Advocate-[OP.UC] a.On. CC to SRl. P RAJENDER REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI S.Two CD Copies.

s

t1 HIGH COURT DATED:06.1'1.2023 91ATE e <'

f L)'

ii TT J\T\ & 1t1\ ,,,o I ,J ORDER:

+ oF5pt.1 SA.No.391 ot 2011 DISMISSED .}> *