Shaik Haider v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11856 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.108 of 2025 of Mamada Police Station, Nirmal District, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the complainant lodged a report before the Police stating that on the night of 14.06.2025, unknown persons entered his house, tied him up, and robbed him of gold ornaments, cash, and personal documents. They threatened him with dire consequences, forced him to call acquaintances for money, kidnapped him in his own car, and attempted to take him towards Hyderabad. At Manoharabad Toll Plaza, he managed to escape and alerted the police.

3.

Heard Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was innocent and falsely implicated in the case without any specific role attributed to him. The allegations in the complaint and remand report did not disclose overt acts against the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner is in jail since 20.06.2025 and that the material part of the investigation is completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition stating that the allegations leveled against the petitioner were serious in nature. He further submitted that the petitioner was a habitual offender and that two other crimes had also been registered against him. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In light of the submissions made by both learned counsel and on a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner had been in jail since 20.06.2025. Till now, no charge sheet had been filed. As seen from the record, the material part of the investigation was completed

and L.Ws.1 to 23 had been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court deemed it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nirmal District.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3)

of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 19.09.2025 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11856 of 2025 Date: 19.09.2025 sai