J. Anitha Kumari, Nalgonda Dist. v. Commr. Of Horticulture And Ano.

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.23798 OF 2013 Between:

J. Anitha Kumari, W/o. Ramesh Reddy, Age 38 years, Occu: Promoter of Model nursery R/o. Konathalapally village, Tripuraram Mandal of Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER AND The Commissioner of Horticulture and Mission Director, State Horticulture Mission, A.P., Public Gardens, Hyderabad.

Senior Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Thummadam (Mukundapuram) Branch, Tripuraram lVtandal, Na lgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1, proceedings No. H. D.A(2)36/lVN/07, dated 31-03-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and Pass an order either to buy-back the plants or direct the respondent to pay the market value of the mother block plants together with interest and damages.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP- NO: 29253 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Gold Ornaments Auction Notice of the Respondent No.2, dated 20-08-2013, Gold Loan No.028630100078910 & 028630100078901 (Gold ornaments) of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petitron. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALLURI RAGHU RAMA AURAVA (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V. RAGHU The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.23798 OF 2013 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 22.01.2024,29.07.2024 and 72.02.2024. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner though the matter was posted under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2.

Having regard to the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present writ petition.

3.

Therefore, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SD/.B. SARASW HI ASSISTANT REGIST AR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI ALLURI RAGHU RAN'IA AURAVA' Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to SRI V. RAGHU, Advocate [OPUCI

4. Two CD CoPies MP CJP Luu

HIGH COURT DATED:2610212024 tAE STATF o ( 2 rPfl 2[?4 o -5 t o6:..; p41cP

ORDER

WP.No.23798 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS 0*.sr