Smt.J.Sarala v. State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * CRIMINAL PETITION No.6318 of 2015 Between:
Smt.J.Sarala & another .. Petitioner/ accused Nos.2 & And State of Telangana, Through its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad & another .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 20-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals
3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6318 of 2015 ORDER :
This Criminal Petition is filed by the Petitioners/ accused Nos.2 & 3 under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.309 of 2015 of Sanathnagar Police Station, Cyberabad registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 506 IPC, outcome of private complaint by 2nd respondent-de facto complainant the learned Magistrate referred to police under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C for investigation.
2) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners/ accused Nos.2 & 3 and learned public prosecutor representing the 1st respondentState before admission and before ordering notice to the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant. Perused the material on record.
3) As the facts falls short to admit the Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings of Crime No.309 of 2015 of Sanathnagar Police Station, Cyberabad registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 506 IPC against the petitioners and another but for the factual matrix entitles the concession of regular bail to petitioners/ accused Nos.2 & 3, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, giving liberty to petitioners/ accused Nos.2 & 3 to surrender themselves before the learned Magistrate concerned and move for regular bail with notice to Assistant public prosecutor concerned, in such an event the learned Magistrate shall grant bail on the same day with necessary conditions. Needless to say at the post bail stage, the learned Magistrate may dispense with their presence.
Needless to say if the petitioners want to file any material in support of their so called innocence or any claim is barred by limitation, they are at liberty to submit the same to Investigating Officer to consider as part of investigation material.
cognizance by the learned Magistrate if any.
4 ) Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Dt.20.07.2015 Knl H.ONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6318 of 2015
Date:20.07.2015 knl