← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/9650/2013dismissed no costs

K. Muniratnam v. The State Of A.P. Rep By Its Principal Secretary,

2017-11-08S.V.Bhatt2 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT W.P.No.9650 OF 2013 ORDER:

No representation for petitioner.

The petitioner prays for the following relief: ...this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly 2nd Respondent in interfering with the lawful and peaceful enjoyment of land admeasuring Ac.0.5 cents in Survey No. 708/3 and Ac. 0.5 cents in Survey No.708/4 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District is as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14 and 300-A, of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the land admeasuring Ac.0.5 cents in Survey No. 708/3 and Ac.0.5 cents in Survey No.708/4 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District, which is a civil dispute, and pass....

The Assistant Government Pleader by relying on written instructions dated 10.04.2013 submits that Cr.No.84 of 2012 is registered against the petitioner and at the instance of petitioner Cr.No.56 of 2012 was registered. The respondent denies interfering with the possession or enjoyment of subject matter of writ petition. This Court is of the view that the respondents since have registered crimes are expected to follow the procedure and the interference alleged in the writ petition is not made out. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, stand closed. ____________ S.V.BHATT, J 08th November 2017 Lrkm