← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC(TR)/313/2017closed no costs

G.Uma Reddy v. Smt. Vakati Karuna, Ias

2024-02-06T.Madhavi Devi3 pages

[ 321e I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI OEVI CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED NO: 313 OF 20'l 7 Coniempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willfully deliberately violating the orders of the Hon'ble APAT,Hyderabad,Dated: 08.06.2015 in O.A. No.2659 of 2015. Between:

G.Uma Reddy, S/o Venkat Reddy, Aged about 44 years, Occ Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-ll, (U/R) and posted as Last Grade Employee At Government BC Boys Hostel, Mogulapally, Warangal District.

...APPLICANT AND

1. Smt. Vakati Karuna, lAS, District Collector (BCW) Warangal, Warangal District.

2. Smt. S.Rama Devi,, The Deputy Director of B.C. Welfare, Warangal, Warangal District.

3. Smt. Sikta Patnaik, lAS, District Collector, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonda District

4. Sri G.Ram Reddy, Deputy Director of BC Welfare Department, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonda District.

5. Sri Burra Venkatesham, IAS (Uc), Commissioner, BC welfare Department, State of Telangana, DSS Bhavan, Masabtank, Hyderabad.

6. Sri Burra Venkatesham, lAS, Principal Secretary, BC Welfare Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

RR3 to 6 impleaded as per court ordet d1.17.11.2023 in lA No.1 of 2023 in CqTR) 313 of 2017 .

...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANTHAPUR SAWANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR SERVICES V The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE ITRI No.313 of 2Ol7 ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that aJter initiating contempt proceedings, the respondents have issued proceedings dated 03.01 .2024 in respect of the petitioner and as no further adjudication is required in this matter, the Contempt Case may be closed Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this contempt case, shall also stand closed.

Sd/. T.KRISHNA KUMAC DEPUTY REGISTR/R r'\ ^ / 'Y SECTION OFFICER To, 1 9r" 99 to Sn Santhapur Satyanarayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to G.p. for Services V, Hig'h Courttor tn" Siri" -of Tetangana [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies plp gh ur- //TRUE COPY// \

HIGH COURT DATED:0610212024

ORDER

CC(TR).No.313 of 2017 1HE S14 I4:

( ((( P a .L oo 0 E we pgy4 a * E)ATC trgO cLosrNG THE CONTEMPT CASE(TR) tq$"rW\