← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/37426/2022withdrawn

Syed Sadiq Mohiuddin v. The State Of Telangana

2022-12-30K.Lakshman4 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT ,..

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 37426 OF 2022 Between:

1. Syed Sadiq Mohiuddin, S/o Late Syed Shah Ahmed Mohiuddin, R/o Deen Gardens ECC Road, The Deens Academy School Whitefield, Bangalore North Karnataka.

2. Syed Shah Rafiq Mohiuddin, S/o Late Syed Shah Ahmed Mohiuddin, Rl/o 185, 8th Main Laughing Waters, OId Airport, Varthur Road Ramagondanhalli, Bangalore, South Karnataka.

3. Farzana Monem, D/o Late Syed Shah Ahmed Mohiuddin, Rl/o 6, Rawdon Street, Kolkata, West Bengal.

,.'

(Petitioners No. 1 to 3 are rep by their GPA Holder Mr.Shahed Khan Sio Ayub Khan Aged about 21 years, Rl/o H.No. 19-4-278/51/4 Tadbun, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad.

--'

...PET|IoNERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

5. V.Ramchander Rao, S/o and age not known to the petitioners R/o H.No. 8-26861812, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

6. Khairuddin, S/o Late AleemuOOin, Occ. Business RiJN-arsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

7. Mohd.Azeemuddin, S/o Late Aleemuddin, Occ. Business R/o Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

8. Mohd.Karimuddin, S/o Late Aleemuddin, Occ. Business R/o Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

a''

...RESPONDENTS

/ Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated n the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the lands in Survey No. 76, 77, 83, 84, 85. 8 to 95 and 104 to 115 and 119, 263 to 272 and 273 situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranqa Reddy District as patta lands of petitioners as declared through Judgment and Decree dated 20-04-1987 passed in O S No. 303 of 1985 on the file of the Additional Sub-Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroornagar, Hyderabad where the official respondents are also parties to the suit and consequently direct th,? respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect of lands in Survey No. 76, 77, 83, 84, 85, 8 to 95 and '104 to '1 15 and 119, 263 lo 272 and 273 situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District;

./- lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect cf lands in Survey No. 76, 77, 83, 84, 85, 8 to g5 and 104 to '1 1 5 and 1 19, 263 to 272 and 273 situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest ofjustice;

/ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. R TIMMA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents Rl TO R4: GP FOR REVENUE ?- Counsel for the Respondent R7: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI The Court made the following: ORDER

/ I HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.37426 OF 2022 ORAL ORDER:

Mr. R. Thimma Reddy, leamed for the petitioners, seeks pennission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberly to avail altemative remedy including filing a fresh writ petition I-le has also addressed a letter dated 27.12.2022 to the Registrar (Judicial) to that ef,fect. The said letter is placed on record. Granting liberty, as sought, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

.SRIHARI ASSISTAN ISTRAR I //TRUE COPYII SE FFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. R TIMMA REDDYAdvocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRl. MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI Advocate IOPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT KLJ DATED: 30fi2i2022 ir. '{ HE ST4 rA:

o Y

ORDER

a oo 2 1 ,ttl",,t 2023 WP.No.37426 ot 2022 WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN OF WITHOUT COSTS