Kavuluri Vidya Sagar v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE Writ Petition No.8145 of 2012 DATED:07.04.2016 Between:

Kavuluri Vidya Sagar, Ranga Reddy District and another.

... Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Administration (Special - A) Department, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad and others.

... Respondents

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE Writ Petition No.8145 of 2012 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners in the present writ petition seek the following relief: "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 7 and 8 to recommend the applications of the petitioners for Fees Reimbursement and Scholarship holding that G.O. Ms. No.66, Social Welfare (SW.EDN.2) Department, dated 8.9.2010 has no application to Backward Classes students as long as G.O. Ms. No.18, Backward Classes Welfare (B2) Department, dated 27.8.

2008 is not modified and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 6 to extend the Post Matric Scholarship and Fees Reimbursement Scheme on Saturation basis to these petitioners if required by declaring the words "However, Students admitted through spot admissions, i.e., left over seats of the Convener quota filled by managements subsequently, will not be eligible for the PMS Scheme" in Clause I (iii) of G.O. Ms. No.66, Social Welfare (SW.EDN.2) Department, dated 08-09-2010 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and has no application for Backward Class students and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

Learned counsel for the petitioners informs the Court that the petitioners have already completed their education and now they are out of college.

Keeping that in view, it is not necessary to examine the challenge, as raised in the present writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. However, challenge to the G.O. is kept open to be raised in appropriate proceedings.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed. No costs.

____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

7th April, 2016 pnb