Sajid Ali v. Smt. Shaheen Fathima

[ 3340 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA APPEAL SUIT NO: 3692 OF 2003 Appeal under Section 1g(1 ) Family Court Act, against the Order dt. 22-7-2003 made in O.S.No.177 of 2000, on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, Telangana.

Between:

Sajid Ali, S/o_.Mohammed Ali, working at Satyam Computers, Vikrampuri, Kharkana, Jubilee Bus Stand, Ryo.l-4-87919518.15, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad. AND ...APPELLANT/ DEFENDANT

1. Smt. Shaheen Fathima, Wo.Sajjad AIi Housewife

2. Kum. Ruskar, D/o.Sajid Ali, aged 7 years, Student (Both are Rl/o. H.No. 1 -4-482, Bholakpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.) ..RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS For the Appellant : SRI D.V.RAMANA MURTHY, Advocate For the Respondents : NO ONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA APPEAL SUIT No. 3692 of 2OO3 ORAL ORDER : (per Hon,btc Slr , Lsticc p.Navcen Rao) On 06.06.2022 whcn rhc matter was called, there was no representation. Again. on I2.O4.2O23 when the matter was called, there was no re1; r.c se ntation. To Hivr: one last opportunity, thr: ms11s1 was rlirected to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Tociul, also when the matter is called, therc is no reprcs(.n tat ion.

2.

ln view thereof, thr. appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending misr.c.llaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-T.KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUIY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// AD SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Judoe. Familv Court, Hvderabad, Hyderabad' (with records. if any) Z. One CC"to'Sri D.V.Ramana-Murlhy Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies Kj c$$'

HIGH COURT DATED:19/04/2023 r-rE SrAis k ORAL ORDER AS.No.3692 of 2003 io \o It 7 IIJE 2$E DISMISSING THE AS FOR NON.PROSECUTION.

u(nrr'u