B. Raghuveer Reddy v. The Ii Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge,

t 32e6 l i

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 30534 OF 2013 Between:

B. Raghuveer Reddy, S/o B. Ram Reddy, Aged 45 years, Occ Business, H.No.1 7-2-751, Madannapet, Saidabad, Hyderabad. Rl/o ...PETITIONER AND The ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge,, Criminal Courts Compound, Nampally, Hyderabad.

Mr. Sultan Saleem, S/o M.A. Raheem, Aged 60 years, Occ Business, Rl/o H.No.5'10, Canna 8lock, Garden Tower, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in lhe nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in not passing any orders on Crl.M.P.No.529 of 2013 and Crl.M.P.No.530 oI 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.485 of 2012 pending on the file of the 1st respondent as arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to pass appropriate orders on merits in Crl.tvl.P.No.529 of 2013 and Crl.M.P.No.530 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.485 of 2O12 pending on the file of the 1'r respondent.

MP. NO:37901 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Criminal Appeal No.485 of 2012, pending disposal of the writ petition.

counser ror the Petition"' ' ,lTi,t tifl35"tRllro*"oM sASrRy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI Y.RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC) Counsel for the Respondent No.z :

-- The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASXAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3O534 of 2Ol3 ORDER:

Mr. P. Animi Reddy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the II relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if i any, shall stand closed.

i SD/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT..REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \.!

SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI V.SUBRAHMANYAM SASTRY, Advocate. [OPUCI

2. One CC to SRI Y.RAIUA RAO, (SC FOR APHC). [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies.

BSK GJP l i i

HIGH COURT DATED:0310112024 //o'

e STAIE .e 0 I rtB zut o ,,J i.+- \ C),\ * De s p.r-.; g,'')

ORDER

WP.No.30534 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETIT!ON AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @a$* Gw-