Mamidi Lachanna v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) I TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 39180 0F 2013 Between:
Mamjdi Lachanna,. S/o. Chinna Gangaram, Age 40 years, Occ: Agriculture coolie, Rl/o. Kusthapur village, Mallapur Mandal, Karimhagar District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary to the Panchayath Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Grampanchayalh Kusthapur, Represented by its Panchayath Secretary, Kusthapur village, Mallapur Mandal, Karimnagar District.
3. The Tahsildar, Mallapur Mandal, Kallapur, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent I no.2 in threatening to demolish construction made by the petitioner for his I I residential house in plot of land admeasuring 0.02 guntas in plot No. 1OO5t1 of I Kusthapur village of Mallapur Mandal, Karimnagar District and also threatening that, the petitioner shall not proceed with the construction in the said plot of his land, even though the petitioner is proceeding with the construction under the deemed permission as already the petitioner submitted his application requesting
{r ,7 to grant permission on 10-10-2013, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and also violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles '14, ,a 19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia. la r I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WP MP. NO:48659 oF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.2, not to intermeddle in any manner in construction activity of the petitioner small residential house in plot of land admeasuring 0.02 guntas in plot No. 1005/1 of Kusthapur village of Mallapur Mandal, Karimnagar District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR PANGHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY, S.C. FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.39 18O of 2O13 ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would' submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.
Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if a.) any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs' ,oI..*'ro*, ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI K. VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC]
2. fwo CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and-Rural Development' High Court for the -' Siaie oifetangana at Hyderabad' [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY' S'C' for Gram Panchayath loPUCl
4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI
5. Two CD CoPies tuP GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:1911212023 1t{E ST;AI€ x q J 1 1 JAN ?02[ o tf cO * .k Il;gp4iC\{
ORDER
WP.No.39180 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6t Cdiu} Z-"X-;sl