← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/7279/2013disposed of no costs

N.Bhaskar Naidu, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-07-26C.Praveen Kumar2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRI T PETI TI ON No.7279 OF 2013 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Government Pleader for Home for the State of Andhra Pradesh appearing for the respondents. With their consent, the present writ petition is disposed of.

2.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in threatening the petitioner and his lessee to vacate the lands admeasuring Ac.0.04 cents and Ac.0.17 cents in Sy.No.255/1B of Thiruchanoor Village accounts, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal and arbitrary, consequently, direct respondents 2 and 3 not to harass, interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and his lessee in respect of the lands mentioned above. 3.

Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and his lessee in respect of the subject property. 4.

Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, denied the interference with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and his lessee by the respondents and further submits that any action to be taken by the respondents will be in accordance with law.

CPK,J WP_7279_2013 5.

Having regard to the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondents, more particularly respondents 2 and 3, not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and his lessee over the lands admeasuring Ac.0.04 cents and Ac.0.17 cents in Sy.No.255/1B of Thiruchanoor Village accounts, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, except in accordance with the procedure established by law.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:26.07.2017 INL