M. Chengalraya Mandadi, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRL.R.C.M.P.Nos.4243 and 4244 of 2017 in/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1495 of 2017 COMMON ORDER :

Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.4243 and 4244 of 2017 are filed to permit the complainant to compound the offence punishable under Section 500 IPC and to record compromise between the parties for the offence punishable under Section 500 IPC in C.C.No.229 of 2014, dated 04.08.2016, on the file of the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tirupati, which was confirmed by the appellate Court on 06.06.2017, vide Criminal Appeal No.323 of 2016 on the file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Tirupati, respectively as the matter was settled due to intervention of elders and entered into compromise.

2.

Both parties appeared in person before the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel and filed Photostat copies of Aadhar Cards in proof of their identity. The terms of compromise read over in Telugu and they admitted to be true and correct. Hence, I find that the compromise is voluntary and apart from that it is a compoundable offence. Therefore, Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.4243 and 4244 of 2017 are allowed.

Crl.R.C.No.1495 of 2017:

3.

In view of the order passed in Crl.R.C.M.P.Nos.4243 and 4244 of 2017, this revision is allowed in terms of memorandum of

compromise, setting aside the order, dated 04.08.2016, passed in C.C.No.229 of 2014 by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court vide judgment, dated 06.06.2017, in Crl.A.No.323 of 2016. 4.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 13th October 2017 mar