A. Keshava Reddy v. The State Of Telangana And 4 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 36586 OF 2021 Between:
A. Keshava Reddy, S/o. Late Buchi Reddy, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Advocate, R/o, H.No.3-4-129lA, Street No.6, Barkatpura, Hyderabad - 27. .,.PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2, The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad
3. The Addl. Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapool, Hyderabad
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division, Ranga Reddy District, Attapur.
5. The Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order, direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus by directing the Respondents to consider the representations dated 16-03-20'18, 12-10-2021 and Application made in online Dharani Podal vide Application No.LM 2100104039 of Writ Petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law in respect of subject lands to an extent of Ac.3-20 gts. in Sy. No . 221 / part of Jukal Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R.
District to implement the names of Writ Petitioner in Online Dharani Pahani and add the subject land in the Pass Book and Title Deed of the Writ Petitioner, lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.4 and 5 to incorporate the name of writ petitioner in Online Dharani Pahani and add the subject land i.e., to an extent of Ac.3-20gts., in Sy.No.22 1/part of Jukal Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District in pass Book and Title Deed of the writ petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.
THE HOT.,BLE SRI ]USTICE B. VI]AYSEN REDDY W eIT PETITION No.36586 of 2021 ORDER:
The petitior 3r claims to the owner and possessor of land in an extent of Ac.3.20 guntas, out of Ac.14.07, guntas, in Sy'No 221 of Jukal Village, Sl'lmshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquiredtheSam.infamilysettlementamonghisbrothers.o.iginalIy the land belonge I to his ancestors, late A' Govind Redcly and late A. Buchi Reddy. l rere was a partition between father of the petitioner and other family nembers and an extent of Ac 3 20 guntas devolved to the share of f s father and his name was reflected in the revenue records and pa lanis as pattedar and possessor' Subsequently' the petitioner an L his brothers got partitioned their ancestral property vlde registered rartition deed bearing document No 5749 af 2Ol7 dated 06,10,2017. The property was dlvided wherein the land in Sy.No.205 and t le land in Sy,No.
22l in an extent of Ac 0 20 guntas out of Ac.3.20 I rntas was allotted to the share of his eder brother' An extent of Ac. 00 guntas in Sy.No 221 devolved to the share of the petitioner and : ubsequently, some adjustments were Inade in the family settlemer t whereby an extent of Ac'o'20 guntas in Sy No'221 was transferred by his elder brother in his favour under a notarized declaration cum sworn affidavit dated 17'08 2019' 2, The petit oner further stated that the children of l^is cousin brother also 9a'e notarized declaration cum swoTn statement aftidavit and admitted :hat the land ln an extent of Ac 3'20 guntas in Sy.No.221 devc ved to the sons of A. Buchi Reddy and that they have no objection fo making rectiflcation to an extent of Ac 3'20 guntas in place of Ac.3.0 ) guntas in Sy'No 221 He approached the respondent No.5videap.
:titiondatedl6.O3.
revenue records and for issujng pattadar pass books and tiUe deeds to the petitioner by deteting the name of A. Krishna Reddy from the pahanies and also from the pattadar pass book and tifle deeds. 3.
The grievance of the petitioner is that there is no response from the respondent No.5. Subsequently, the petitioner lodged a petition dated 12.10,2021 with the respondents No.2 to 5 for taking necessary action pursuant to the representation of the petitioner, The petitioner also made an application in Online Dharani portal vide application No.LM 210010439 to consider his request.
4.
In the circumstances, the writ petition ls dlgposed of directing the respondent No.s/Tahsildar to pass orders on the representations of the petitioner dated 16.03.2018, 12.10.2021 and application No.LM 210010439 made vide Online Dharani portal, within a period of eight
(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by following the process of law and issuing notices to all persons interested and hearing them.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
I I SD/.K.ONESIM ,TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT R GIST SECTION FFICER To, ' Il:Jrli:f l secretary Revenue Department, secretariat, State of rerangana,
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapoot, Hyderabad
3. The Addl. Coilector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapoot, Hyderabad o lll:fi:*"'e Divisional officer, Rajendranagar Division, Ranga Reddy District,
5. The Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
6. One CC to Sri. lvlahboob Hussain Advocate tOpUCl
7. Two CCs to Gp for REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] B. Two CD Copies
9. One Spare Copy.
rsn SW A$,.
HIGH COURT DATED3'111212021 s toJAN2022
ORDER
WP.No.36586 ol 2021 DISPOSING OF THI \\'RIT PETITIOI'
WITHOUT COSTS \i"
\D A\{X