V. Alivelu Manga Tayaru v. The District Educational Officer

[ 3255 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4506OF 2017 Between:

V. Alivelu Manga Tayaru, W/o. K.Srinivasa Chary, Aged about 46 years, S.G.T., U.P.S., Birsaipeta, Utnoor Mandal, Adilabad District, Fl/o. Utnoor. ... PETITIONERYAPPLICANT AND

1. The District Educational Officer, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 504 001

2. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. -500 004

3. The State of Telangana, represented By its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5O0 O22 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled to be transferred to the schools situated in plain area of Adilabad District on the basis of the entitlement points in the ensuing transfer counseling since she was appointed in plain area with all consequential benefits in terms of Notification issued in G.O.Ms.No.3 SW dt.10.01 .2000 by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicant for transfer to plain area schools is illegal and contrary to the Notification Vide G.O.Ms.No.3 dt.10.01.2009, discriminatory and unjust, and pass such other and further orders.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION ffR) No.4506 OF2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, I learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/- L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTAN2{EGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// T,U) SECTION OFFICER To, I TJ"[o One CC to Sri. D Bala Kishan Rao, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Services, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DATED:1511212022 I I I i [ 2 f'fB ?Sl3 €N ,/ ',/

ORDER

)- WP(TR).No.4506 of 2017 DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PET|TION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

?-q i1-} $u)'