M/S Comfort Securities Limtied, Mumbai v. M/S Amr India Limited, Hyderabad And 1 Other

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR ctvl MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 417 OF 2017 Appeal Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 against the Judgment/Decree in o.P.(ARB).No.1611 of 2016 dated 08.08.2016 on the file of the Court of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad' Between:

M/s. Comfort securities Limited, 4-301 , Hetal Arch, S.V.Road, Malad (w), Mumbai - Oa. Represented by its authorized signatory, Sri Pradeep Mundra' ..,APPELLANT/PETITIONER/OEFENDANT AND Mis.AMRlndiaLimited,(FormerlyM/s.AMRConstructionsLtd-,)'Havingits i"_oisiereO office at Plot Nb. 88, Sdrikonda Mansion. Phase lll. Kamalapuri. c;;;;, Hy;;*biil nlp uv its Manager - Accounts, sri c Hanumanth Reddv ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

2. Oriental Bank of Commerce' Plot No, 127'1 , Road No 63' Jubliee Hills' Hyderabad - 33 Rep. by its Branch Manager ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI CH' PUSHYAM KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No'2: SRI BACHINA HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: NONE APPEARED The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

{.- I HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO ANI) HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR c.11 .A. No.117 ot 2017 JL;DGMENT: 1l)er Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Counsel on both sides state that the matter has become in fl'uctuous Recording the same, this Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand c losed.

Sd/- K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The lll Additionat Chief Judge, City Civit Court, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri Ch. Pushyam Kiran, Advocate tOpUCl

3. One CC to Sri Bachina Hanumantha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] , Two CD Copies One Spare Copy br s

HIGH COURT DATED: 0910612021 -i vrg Sia k ti:

foo ,:] 2 3 JUll 2$21

JUDGMENT

+ sha_:a'-\ CMA.No.417 o12017 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS ?

),,1