Naragani Vishal v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12212 of 2025 Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.2 in FIR No.528 of 2025 of Jubilee Hills Police Station, Hyderabad District, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that, on 14-08-2025 at around 09.50 PM, after completion of office hours, the de-facto complainant along with his employees went to Chandrakala Theater, at Moosapet to watch Coole Movie and after watching the movie, pavan left home and remaining all started to office on their bikes, on the way they dropped Srinija at her home and were standing on road near her house, in the meantime, one black colour car bearing No. AP28DA0516 came near to them and two unknown persons got down from car and abused them and tried to come onto them, then the de-facto complainant tried to calm them but one person having full beard wearing grey colour full hands shirt started abusing and all of sudden hit the de-facto complainant on face with his forehead, then de-facto
complainant's employees tried to save him, but another unknown person in yellow colour T-shirt having cigarette in hand abused them and tried to come onto them. Hence, he requested to take necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case in Crime No.528 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 110, 281, 140(3), 115(2), 351(2), 352 r/w Section 3(5) of BNS. 3.
Heard Sri S. M. Saifullah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the all the alleged offences are against the accused No.1 and the only allegation against the petitioner/accused No.2 is that the petitioner herein used filthy language. It is further submitted that the petitioner herein is in jail from 15.08.2025 and the material part of the investigation was already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner stating that the allegations leveled against the petitioner are serious in nature. Further, the investigation is not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6.
In light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is in jail from 15.08.2025. Further, as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 15 witnesses were already examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions.
i.
The petitioner/accused No.2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XVII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Hyderabad.
ii.
The petitioner/accused No.2 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/accused No.2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 19.09.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12212 of 2025 Date:19.09.2025 TU