← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/12266/2025disposed of no costs

Ms. Surekha Saini, v. The State Of Telangana

2025-09-24K. Sujana4 pages

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12266 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused in Crime No.1155 of 2024 of Punjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad.

2.

Heard Sri M.P.Kashyap, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.

3.

Without going into the merits of the case, it is seen from the record that the petitioners have directly approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS. 4.

At this stage, it is pertinent to note the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Mohammed Rasal. C

and Another v. State of Kerala and Another1, it is clearly held that though the Sessions Court and the High Court exercise concurrent jurisdiction to entertain applications for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS (formerly Section 438 Cr.P.C.), judicial discipline and the hierarchy of Courts require that such applications must ordinarily be filed before the Sessions Court in the first instance. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further observed that entertaining such applications directly in the High Court, without first invoking the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court, undermines procedural discipline and unnecessarily burdens the High Court with matters that can be effectively dealt with at the District level. The Sessions Court, being the court of first contact, is better placed to consider such applications as it has immediate access to case records and the assistance of the concerned Public Prosecutor. It is only in exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, with reasons specifically recorded, that the High Court may entertain a direct application. 5.

In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the petitioners 1 Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.6588/2025 dated 08.09.2025

to first approach the trial Court for seeking the relief of anticipatory bail.

6.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the trial Court for grant of pre-arrest bail.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 24.09.2025 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12266 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2025 SAI