Gudi Rakesh v. Gudi Ramya

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1745 OF 2016 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner, challenging the order, dated 26.05.2016 passed in Crl.M.P. No.370 of 2016 in MC No.15 of 2016 by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC cum Family Court cum XXIII Chief Judge cum IX Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, whereby the learned Judge directed the petitioner to pay Rs.7,500/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.3,000/- each per month to respondents 2 and 3 as interim maintenance.

The 1st respondent is the wife and the respondents 2 and 3 are children of the petitioner. The respondents filed MC No.15 of 2016 before the Court below against the petitioner seeking maintenance. They also filed Crl.M.P. No.370 of 2016 before the Court below against the petitioner seeking interim maintenance at Rs.20,000/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.15,000/- each to the respondents 2 and 3, pending disposal of the MC. The Court below, after evaluating the evidence and also after hearing the arguments made by both the parties, partly allowed the said application granting interim maintenance at Rs.7,500/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondents 2 and 3. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision is filed.

Heard and perused the material available on record. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of modifying the order under revision, as follows:

The petitioner is directed to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,750/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.1,500/- per month to the respondents 2 and 3, from the date of the above application till disposal of MC. He is also directed to pay the said maintenance amount on or before 10th of every succeeding month and the arrears if any, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the MC, as expeditiously as possible without being influenced by this order and the order under revision.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________ RAJA ELANGO, J July 05, 2016.

KTL