G. Vasudeva Reddy v. The Principal Secretary To Govt. Of A.P.

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA - AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 635 OF 2017 Between:

G. Vasudeva Reddy, S/o. G.Malla Reddy, aged about 48 years, Working as a Municipal Assistant Executive Engineer, Bodhan Municipality, Bodhan, Nizamabad District, Rl/o. H.No.17-2111 , Srinagar Colony, Siddipet, Medak District.

..,PETITIONER AND

1. The Principal Secretary to Govt. of A.P., Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 001 .

2. The Engineering in Chief Public Health, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad 500 002. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer from the post of Municipal Assistant Executive Engineer without reference to the charge memo in G.O.Rt.No.'1385 dated 29.10.2011 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and against rules and consequently direct the respondents to consider applicant case for promotion to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer with all consequential benefits.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABI,E SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.635 OF 2017 I ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) IS dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

..1 AssrsrAi?i[i,'i$i*l* //TRUE COPY// ;, - -'

I To ].w9 CCs to Gp FOR SERVICES, High Court r"r,n" ,,"r"to=r::il"T.:::tHyderabad. IOUTl 9n" 99 to SRt VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY, Advocate IOPUCI Two CD Copies 2.

3.

PSK.

GJP gx,.

HIGH COURT DATED:1910112023 I

ORDER

WP(TR).No.635 of 2017 aD 1 t''l ?rm $ r:

{ DrsMrsslNG THE WR|T PETTTION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

6 G6D \nl,l,r.