Smt. B.Bhagyavathi W/O. Bhaskar, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By The Principal
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 27265 OF 2017 O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the official respondents, in particular the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6 herein even after the same was ceased up by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool in O.S.No.397 of 2016 filed by the petitioner seeking a decree of perpetual injunction in violation of the injunctive orders granted by the said Court in favour of the petitioner in I.A.No.428 of 2016 against the respondents 5 and 6 at the instance of 4th respondent and interfering with his life and liberty.
The case of the petitioner, as can be seen from the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, is that Respondents 4 to 6 are interfering with his possession and enjoyment over the land in Sy.No.135/1 to an extent of Ac.2.50 cents, Jagadurthy Village, Dhone Mandal, Kurnool District, while causing obstacle for conducting the agricultural operations in the said land and therefore having no other alternative, the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.397 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool seeking a decree of perpetual injunction against the respondents 4 to 6 and after considering the contentions and the documentary evidence on record, the Court below had granted interim injunction in I.A.No.428 of 2016 against the respondents 4 and 5 and the same is subsisting as on date. Even though the interim injunction is in favour of the petitioner, basing on the
complaint made by the 4th respondent, the 3rd respondent addressed a letter as if the respondents 4 to 6 were in possession of the property and sought clarification from the Tahsildar and not permitting the petitioner to conduct the agricultural operations yielding to the pressures brought out by the respondents 4 to 6. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions, submits that the allegations made in the affidavit are all false. It is time to observe that day in and day out, this Court is flooded with Writ Petitions of the present nature and complaints are being lodged with the Superintendent of Police against the Station House Officers concerned alleging that they are interfering with the civil disputes and in that connection, detaining one party illegally, at the instance of the other. Normally, in such cases, when this Court issues notice, the police officials have been giving instructions denying the allegations made against them. Though there is no order, in writing, seeking their appearance before the police station, out of fear, the petitioner, for that matter, the other citizens are constrained to attend the respective police station. In this scenario, this Court takes judicial note of these aspects occurring on daily basis.
As a matter of fact, the Apex Court in 2006 itself, while rendering judgment in Prakash Singh v Union of India1, made certain recommendations and directed them to be binding on the State Governments. A learned Judge of this Court also considered 1 (2006) 8 SCC 1
the subject issue, in detail, in Writ Petition No. 14072 of 2016 and batch. After taking notice of the judgments of the Supreme Court, the learned Single Judge vide judgment dated 27.04.
2017, had directed to implement the ruling rendered in Prakash Singh's case, the operative portion of which reads as under: "In view of the above legal position, these Writ Petitions are disposed of directing the Principal Secretaries to Governments, Home Departments of Telangana and the Andhra Pradesh to constitute a 'State Security Commission' and a 'Police Complaints Authority' as directed by the Supreme Court in Prakash Singh, by co-opting the Member Secretary of the State Legal Services Authority of the concerned States as Member of the State Security Commission and the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority as a Member of the Police Complaints Authority at the District Level.
Since more than a decade has passed after the Supreme Court issued directions and there is an urgent need to create a mechanism for redressal of the grievances of the public in respect of police actions, the "State Security Commission" and the "Police Complaints Authority" shall be constituted as expeditiously as possible not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such constitution, the complaints of the petitioners in the above three writ petitions, shall be sent to the State Security Commission for further action since there was failure on the part of the Superintendents of Police concerned in taking action by investigating into the complaints. On constitution of such Commission and Authority, wide publicity shall be given in the print and electronic media in order to educate the general public."
In that view of the matter, since the State is yet to take steps, as directed by this Court, in terms of Prakash Singh's case, the 2nd respondent Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, shall initiate necessary disciplinary action, if warrants against the 3rd respondent-Station House Officer. It may also be noted that the petitioner shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief against 3rd respondent Station House Officer in his eo nominee capacity. He also can seek damages against the individual, who is officiating as the 3rd respondent. Once the civil action is initiated against the individual, he is required to approach the civil Court and defend himself and justify why the damages should not be awarded against him. In that way, an effective check can be put against the individuals who are officiating and abusing their office.
Subject to above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand closed.
____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J 16th August 2017 Gk
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 27265 OF 2017 Date:16.08.2017 Gk