← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/29/2014dismissed

Mrs. Siddamma v. K.Ganga Reddy

2022-08-04Sambasivarao Naidu3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 29 OF 2014 Petition under Section 1 15 of CPC aggrieved by the order dated 3-9-20'13 in lA No. 44 of 2013 in OS NO. 12OO of 2007(old No. 5821 of 2004) on the file of the 3rd Addl. Rent Controller Cum 15th Junior Civil Judge City Civil Court Hyderabad.

Between:

Mrs. Siddamma, W/o. Late S.Narayana, Household, Fl/o. 9-4-130 and 131 Akbarbagh, Towli Chowki, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERYPLAINTIFF AND

1. K.Ganga Reddy, S/o. Late K.K.Reddy, Private SErvice, Rlo. 12-5-121, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, and also at 4-1-829, S.N. [Vlemorial Trust endowment department, J.N.Road, Abids, Hyderabad

2. M.A.Salam, S/o. M.S.Sami, Business No.19-3-702 & 703-8, Gazibanda, Hyderabad

3. Mohammed Ashfaq,, S/o. M.S.Sami, Business Ryo. 19-3-702 & 703-8, Gazibanda, Hyderabad

4. Mohammed Shareef, S/o. Mohammed Pasha, Business R/o. 18-4-'106, Ansari Road, Mir Alam tAnk, Hyderabad J ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS CRPMP. NO: 3332 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring on record the petitioners/Proposed parties as petitioner NO. 2 to 10 in the above CRP of 2013, and also in CRP MP NO. of 2013 pending before this Hon'ble Court.

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. MOHD ILYAS Counsel for the Respondents:

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU Qrvr! REVISION PETITION No.29 0F 2U-L4 ORDER:

This revision is preferred against the order in I.A.No.44 of 2013 filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act with a prayer to condone the delay of 14Og days in filing application to set aside the dismissal order dated O4.O8.2OO9. However, the said application was dismissed by the trial Court on 03.09.2013.

2.

No representation on petitioners, side. There \.\.as no representation even on 2g.OT.2O22. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption for dismissal, yet, there is no representation on petitioners, side. 3.

Hence, this Civit Revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

4.

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.

I SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I \ //TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The 3rd Addl. Rent Controller Cum 15th Junior Civil Judge City Civil Court Hyderabad.

2. One CC to SRI MOHD ILYAS Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies

4. One spare copy NPJ -\ *":

HIGH COURT SSRN, J DATED:0410812022 STA rE t-)'

,) 15 rLtil o l.'

.. * ^; ,,,1,.,-"

ORDER

CRP.No.29 of 2014 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION.