P. Narasimha Reddy v. State Of Telangana.

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the genuine case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent while considering the number of juniors to the petitioner only on the ground that departmental proceedings initiated against the petitioner are pending, as illegal and arbitrary and sought consequential direction to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Superintendent without reference to the pendency of disciplinary proceedings.

2.

Heard Sri Linga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for respondents.

3.

It is contended by the petitioner that he is working as Senior Assistant and is provisionally eligible to be qualified to the post of Superintendent. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is very much eligible and qualified for promotion to the post of Superintendent, the respondents are not considering his case for promotion to the said post on the ground that the disciplinary proceedings in the form of charge memo dt.11-11-2014 are pending.

AKS,J 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the State Government has taken a policy decision in G.O.Ms.No.257 dt.10-06-1999 wherein elaborate guidelines were framed by the State Government as to the consideration of the cases of employees against whom disciplinary action and criminal cases are pending and the appointing authority must consider the cases of such employees who are facing disciplinary/criminal action as to whether they are entitled for promotion in spite of disciplinary/criminal proceedings are pending against them. But in the instant case, the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257 dt.10-06-1999. Therefore, he contended that appropriate orders be passed directing the respondents to consider case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent strictly in terms of the guidelines framed in the said G.O.

5.

Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education submits that the case of the petitioner would be considered for promotion to the post of Superintendent strictly in terms of the G.O.Ms.No.257 dt.10-06-1999 and appropriate orders would be passed.

6.

Having regard to the rival submissions made by the parties, this Court is of the considered view that this Writ Petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent strictly

AKS,J in terms of the G.O.Ms.No.257 dt.10-06-1999 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

8.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Date: 14-03-2019 kvr