K.R.Ramachandra Rao v. Central Warehousing Corporation
[ 33021 rN rHE HrGH GouRr Ff,IJJtlBt^TE oF TELANGANA FYE * '
otRA'+ I35 5f.YSI[ 3il'3[ "':il PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K' SARATH couRT AP NO: 3890F 2003 cITY ClvrL L :L'&flff Stl,'df ;"l"il'"",fl ,l-:"'33H:'l'"'#'8fl "J:"'tl?"S:tr"
dated r Civil I l Between:
H,T?,L?-'""i;r:H"fi :lHligs,l:'.1*nH*-Tihrfutrjlf ;;: K.R.Ramachandra Rao' S/o late AND 'r,$,t'"**'*,ili:l{lf,Ni,nr-[J.,iHi]fl"}filtiYf, ffi:: 2 Financial Adviser' uenrldr vvqru.*-" r I rffi ffiffir1#:::'Iull'c;f[c,p*,ffi (Respondent No'4 i 28lo4l2o11l "'RespondentslDefendants Gounsel for the Appellant(s): Sri P B VIJAY KUM|1t*Ot BEING PRESENT) Counsel for the ResponO"nt f'fo"'f to 3: Sri BODDIPALLI RAMESH The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH C.C.C.A.No.389 of 2003 IUDGMENT This appeal is coming for hearing since 2003. t)r't 77 .08.2023 when the matter was called, there was no representation, ancl therefore the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this case.
2.
Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution/default. No order as to costs. 3.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
"iSsIHE[ts,tlR \ I lli ,TTRUE COPY,, .D*, SECTION OFFICER '" i H":'LE H:!i'tiJf':a9'}'ffiiH}#"iii'Fi''
4. Two CD CoPies SP
HIGH COURT DATED:0410912023
JUDGMENT
CGCA.No.389 of 2003 €'r T4 t\ S o + zo .L iJ * .* \:
H,'
a P ,S DISMISSING THE CCGA FOR NON PROSECUTION /, It \n>