High Court for State of TelanganaWP/34671/2014closed no costs

Anwarunnisa v. The State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

2020-01-07P.Keshava Rao2 pages

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.34671 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: "... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents Nos.2 to 4 in not initiating criminal action against the 5th and 6th respondents as per complaints dated 13.06.2014 and 27.10.2014 of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and unconstitutional."

Learned Government Pleader placed on record written instructions dated 28.11.2014 issued by the Inspector of Police, Sanathnagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate.

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that the petitioner has sent a petition dated 13.06.2014 through post to the 4th respondent and the same was received on 28.10.2014. In the said petition, the petitioner requested the respondent police to initiate action against one Mr. Nisar Khan and two others i.e., respondent Nos.5 and 6 herein, since they are obstructing her tenants not to pay the rents and also forcibly taken an undertaking in writing to pay rents to respondent No.5. Pursuant to the said complaint, an entry was made in the general diary of the station on 28.10.2014. After conducting preliminary enquiry, a case in Crime No.592 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 341 and 323 IPC was registered against respondent Nos.5

and 6 and investigation was taken up. In the said written instructions, it is also stated that the petitioner is a petition monger and used to put petitions to higher authorities and on her earlier complaints, two cases were registered vide Crime Nos.135 of 2014 and 343 of 2014 for various offences. The learned Government Pleader also brought to the notice of this Court that pursuant to the registration of Crime No.592 of 2014, investigation was completed and a final report was filed referring the case as "civil in nature". If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said final report, she can ventilate her grievance by way of a protest application before the same Magistrate.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J Date: 07.01.2020.