Pramod Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Pamayyagari Parameshwari

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: Arbitration Application No.114 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 2.

12.07.2024 CJ I.A.No.1 of 2024 Ms. V. Soubhagya Valli, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Seetharama Avadhani, learned counsel for the applicant.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the applicant is granted leave to implead proposed respondent No.20 as respondent No.20 in the arbitration application.

In the result, the interlocutory application is allowed.

_________ CJ (AAJ) I.A.No.2 of 2024 Ms. V. Soubhagya Valli, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Seetharama Avadhani, learned counsel for the applicant.

Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, I find that sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 190 days in representing the arbitration application is made out.

In the result, delay in representing the arbitration application is condoned and the interlocutory application is allowed.

_________ CJ (AAJ) Arbitration Application No.114 of 2024 Arbitration application is allowed.

(vide separate order) (B/o.) ES