T.Nagalakshmamma, v. Gemedi Seenaiah,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD Crl.A.No.1185 of 2011 Date:28.8.2018 Between:

T.Nagalakshmamma, W/o Late Ramanaiah .....Appellant And:

1.Gemedi Seenaiah, S/o Ramanaiah.

2.The State, reptd., by the Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad.

.....Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Mr. G.Vijaya Saradhi Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr. V.Roopesh Kumar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor for the State of AP The Court made the following:

CVNR, J & TA, J CrlA.No.1185 of 2011 Dt:28.8.2018 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Criminal Appeal is filed by the de facto complainant against the acquittal of respondent No.1-the sole accused in Sessions Case No.410 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, vide judgment, dated 19.8.2011.

At the hearing, Mr. G.Vijaya Saradhi, learned counsel for the appellant, fairly conceded that the appellant has not sought and secured leave from this Court for filing this Criminal Appeal, which is held mandatory by the Apex Court in Satya Pal Singh Vs State of M.P. and Ors1.

In view of the incurable defect on account of the failure on the part of the appellant to obtain leave from this Court, the Criminal Appeal is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. The Criminal Appeal is accordingly dismissed. _____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY __________________________ JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD 28th August, 2018 DR 1 (2015) 15 SCC 613