Ch. Meenaiah, v. N. Siddaiah Goud,
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.712 of 2017 ORDER:
Heard the revision before admission and before notice to respondent No.1.
From the expression of Dilip S. Dahanukar Vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Limited1 it is the submission that there the amount awarded is almost less than 1/10th of the amount. In fact the principle laid down in the expression is criteria and not the quantum. However, awarding of 1/4th of the amount to deposit for suspending the sentence by the first appellate Court since erroneous, it is modified to 1/6th of the amount to deposit on or before 17.04.2017. Failing which the lower Court can recover the same under Section 421 read with Section 431 Cr.P.C. by levying warrant.
Accordingly and in the result, the criminal revision is case is disposed of.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any shall stand closed. No costs.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE Dr. B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Date: 17.03.2017 ska 1 (2007) 6 SCC 528