M/S S S V Electricals v. Transmission Corporation Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd,

Writ Petition No.4423 of 2014 ORDER:

Neither is the learned counsel for the petitioner present, nor is there any representation on his behalf.

The action of the respondents in not allotting any work under the tender notification issued by the 1st respondent to any one of the Scheduled Tribe candidates, though there is a condition under tender notification that at least 15% will be awarded to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, is questioned in this writ petition as being arbitrary and illegal.

By an order in W.P.M.P. No. 5461 of 2014, dated 18.2.2014, the respondents were directed to strictly follow the rule of reservation as per rules framed under the Tender Notification dated 23.1.2014, issued by the 1st respondent. As the interim order protects the interests of the petitioner, as sought for in the main writ petition, no further orders need be passed.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) 30th September, 2016

Writ Petition No.4423 of 2014 Date: 30.09.2016

Writ Petition No. 22338 of 2007 ORDER:

Neither Sri M.V.Narasimham, learned counsel for the petitioner, is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Anganwadi worker at Anganwadi Centre of Katepalli B.C. Colony, Vinjamur Mandal, Nellore District.

Learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare, would submit that in terms of the interim order passed by this Court on 22.10.2007, the petitioner's case was considered along with other eligible candidates and her candidature was rejected as she was over aged.

As the relief sought for by the petitioner is to consider her case and her case has been considered albeit pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the cause in the writ petition does not survive, and that the writ petition has become infructuous.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) 30th September, 2016

Writ Petition No. 22338 of 2007 Date: 30.09.2016